Press & media
The story, the process and the open questions.
For journalists and specialists: Anti-Beunhaas proposes better case preparation and a future independent quality mark for trades. We welcome critical scrutiny.
The public-interest question
How can a client check workmanship without being a specialist? And how can an honest business receive a fair hearing when a dispute arises? The proposal combines prevention, case assessment and a clearly scoped quality mark.
The proposal in one minute
Organise agreements and evidence first. Hear both parties and ask an appropriately qualified independent specialist to assess technical issues. Businesses would have a separate certification route with published requirements, a second decision-maker and verifiable validity.
Where things stand
The website and detailed proposal are available. The foundation has not been incorporated, an independent board has not been appointed and no certificates have been issued. There are no case-handling or certification pilot results to claim.
We ask the difficult question ourselves
The founder runs a commercial construction and installation business. This is why excluding affiliated businesses from the first pilot, separate decision-makers and disclosed funding are central to the proposal. Independence must be demonstrated in practice.
A conversation with the press
We would welcome a discussion of the proposal and its weaknesses. A conversation or editorial interest is not an endorsement. Radar is not a partner and has not approved the initiative. Press enquiries: info@antibeunhaas.nl.
The full proposal
Read the development plan with procedures, decision rules and the steps before a pilot. Version 0.2, for review.